V.Senthil Kumar v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.11.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN Crl OP.No.17831 of 2020 V.Senthil Kumar

...Petitioner

Vs.

State rep.by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Arakonam, Ranipet District

...Respondent

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner in connect with CSR No.223/2020 pending enquiry on the file of respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Padmeshwari For Respondent : Ms. M. Prabhavathi Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

It is represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor that the complaint lodged by the defacto-complainant is pending for enquiry and his presence is required for concluding enquiry expeditiously. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police on 02.12.2020 for enabling the respondent police to conduct enquiry and the respondent police is directed to conclude the enquiry expeditiously. With the abovesaid observation, the criminal original petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Copy to

1. State rep.by The Inspector of Police All Women Police Station Arakonam, Ranipet District

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. +1cc to Mr.P.Padmeswari, Advocate, S.R.No.36592 Crl OP.No.17831 of 2020 SPD(CO) RV(07/12/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/