Kumaravel v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No.14148 of 2023 Crl.O.P.No.14148 of 2023 RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN.,J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 294(b), 324 and 506(ii) of I.P.C, read with TNPWH Act in Crime No.192 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 09.06.2023, on a birthday party a wordy quarrel arose between the de-facto complainant and the petitioner due to that the petitioner assaulted the de-facto complainant. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioners. 4.Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the counter case is pending. However, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

Crl.O.P.No.14148 of 2023 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J., nvi 5.Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (crl.side) and perused the materials available on record.

6.Taking into the facts and circumstance of the case and considering the nature and gravity of the offence committed by the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners for the present, with a liberty to file fresh application after passage of time or change in circumstances.

7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21.09.2023 nvi Crl.O.P.No.14148 of 2023 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2