Hari Krishnan v. The Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.05.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN Hari Krishnan ... Petitioner -vs1.The Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

2.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu Taluk, Chengalpattu.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvadisulam, Chengalpattu Taluk.

4.Smt.Kannikka ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.03.2025. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.S.Prabhakaran, 1 to 3 Government Advocate **********

ORDER

The petitioner seeks for the following relief:- The petitioner's case is that he has paid the fee for the purpose of survey and yet the respondents are not carried out the work entrusted to them. Hence, this writ petition.

2. When the matter is taken up, Mr.S.Prabhakaran, learned Government Advocate representing the State, submits that if the fee has been paid, the survey will be conducted within a period of six weeks from today. He also states that prior to the survey, the petitioner as well the fourth respondent or any other person interested in the property will be put on notice. The statement is recorded.

2/4

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 23.05.2025 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rna/at To 1.The Collector, Chengalpattu District, Chengalpattu.

2.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu Taluk, Chengalpattu.

3.The Village Administrative Officer, Thiruvadisulam, Chengalpattu Taluk.

3/4

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN.J, rna/at 23.05.2025 4/4