Madras High CourtSA/82/2014dismissed for nonprosecution

C.Ranganathan v. Rathinammal

2019-12-05Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 05.12.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM S.A.No.82 of 2014 C.Ranganathan .. Appellant

Versus

1. Rathinammal

2. Alamelu

3. G.Arjunan .. Respondents Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 29.09.2009 passed in A.S.No.31 of 2009 on the file of the Principal Sub Judge, Salem upholding the decree and judgment dated 10.11.2008 passed in O.S.No.14 of 2007 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Salem.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.J.Franklin

JUDGMENT

When the matter was listed on 03.12.2019, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the appeal is posted today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today there is no representation for the appellant, hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar 1 / 2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

pvs To

1. The Principal Sub Judge, Salem

2. The I Additional District Munsif, Salem.

S.A.No.82 of 2014 mg(co) nr 10/01/2020 2 / 2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/