← Library
Madras High CourtWP/7422/2015dismissed

M/S.Akshaya Traders v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2015-03-17Honourable Mr Justice R. Karuppiah,Honourable Mr Justice R. Sudhakar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.03.2015

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.KARUPPIAH Writ Petition No.7422 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015 M/s.Akshaya Traders rep. By its Proprietor A.Rajamani No.6/20, Varadharajan Lay Out, Poonthottam, Villuram - 605 602.

.. Petitioner Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Secretary Commercial Taxes and Registration Department Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Villupuram - II, Villupuram .. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring that Sections 19(1), 19 (10)(a) and 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Rule 10(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2007 are inconsistent with the charging Section 3 and the general scheme of annual assessment under Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, and further void as being arbitrary and irrational, infringing the rights of the petitioner under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and the resultant proposal to reverse the input tax credit invoking Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act as violative of Articles 265 and 300A of the Constitution of India. For Petitioner :

Ms.R.Hemalatha For Respondents:

Mr.AR.Jayapratap Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

(Made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.) This Writ Petition is filed for issuance of a writ of Declaration, declaring that Sections 19(1), 19(10)(a) and 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 and Rule 10(2) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Rules, 2006 are inconsistent with the charging Section 3 and the general scheme of annual assessment under Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2007, and further void as being arbitrary and irrational, infringing the rights of the petitioner under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) and the resultant proposal to reverse the input tax credit invoking Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act as violative of Articles 265 and 300A of the Constitution of India.

2. The provisions challenged in this writ petition were tested before this Court in a batch of writ petitions and have already been upheld in a decision in USA Agencies v. The Commercial Tax Officer, 2013 (5) CTC 63. Following the said decision, the present writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, M.P.No.1 of 2015 is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sl To

1. The Secretary State of Tamil Nadu Commercial Taxes and Registration Department Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

2. The Assistant Commissioner (CT), Villupuram - II, Villupuram + 1 cc to M/s. S. Hemalatha, Advocate SR.14890 + 1 cc Government Pleader Sr.15063 P(CO) EU 06.04.2015 Writ Petition No.7422 of 2015 & M.P.No.1 of 2015

17.03.2015