Peer Amma v. Subeda Beevi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 10.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH C.S.No.262 of 2012 and A.No.6263 of 2015 1.Peer Amma 2.Kadhar Maideen 3.Samsudeen ... Plaintiffs Vs 1.Subeda Devi 2.Mohammed Sirajuddin 3.Thahira 4.Farida Begum 5.Hussaina ... Defendants Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of the Original Side Rules r/w Order VII Rule 1 C.P.C.

For Plaintiffs : Mr.V.Raghavachari For Defendants : Mr.R.Venkataraman

JUDGMENT

The suit has been laid for the following reliefs: (i)to pass a preliminary decree for partition of the suit A and B schedule property into two equal parts by metes and bounds and allot one such share to the plaintiffs. (ii)to grant a consequential injunction restraining the defendants, their men, agents, subordinates or anybody https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

claiming through them from in any manner alienating or dealing with the suit A and B schedule property till such time the partition is effected by metes and bounds among the plaintiff and defendants.

(iii)to direct the defendants to render accounts towards the business left over by the Janab Abdul Rahman. (iv)to award costs of the proceedings 2.Learned counsel for the plaintiffs seeks permission to withdraw the suit and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the plaintiffs, the civil suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected application is closed.

sd/.M.M.S.J 10.06.2016 //Certified to be a true copy// Dated this the day of 2016.

S.s/03.11.2016 COURT OFFICER From 25.09.2008 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Order/Judgment Decree in this format.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/