Madras High CourtCS/607/2014disposed of in memo of compromise

V.S.Varusai Kani v. R.Anand

2017-12-182 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 18.12.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN C.S.No. 607 of 2014 and A.No.2017 of 2016 V.S.Varusai Kani ... Plaintiff Vs.

R.Anand ... Defendant Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S. Rules and Under OR VII Rule 1 C.P.C. praying to pass a judgment and decree for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 02.05.2012 registered as Document No.1782/2012 at SRO, Purasawakkam executed by the defendant by directing him to execute and register the sale deed in favour of plaintiff and in dafault the sale deed be executed and registered by the officer of this Hon'ble Court in favour of the plaintiff for the suit property and grant cost of the suit. For Plaintiff : M/s. D.Babu Varadharajan For Defendant : M/s. P.Kavitha

JUDGMENT

The suit is one for specific performance. The parties have filed a Compromise Memo, which sets out the terms of the compromise. The parties have also affirmed the fact that they have entered into a memo of http://www.judis.nic.in

R. SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dpq compromise. Both the plaintiff as well as the defendant are present before this Court. Parties also accept the terms of compromise. The parties as well as the learned counsel for the parties have signed the same. Hence the suit is decreed in terms of compromise. The Compromise Memo shall form part of the decree. The parties shall bear their own cost.

2. In view of joint memo of compromise, the suit is decreed and consequently connected application is dismissed. 18.12.2017 dpq Index: Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order C.S.No.607 of 2014 and A.No.2017 of 2016 http://www.judis.nic.in