← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/17784/2020dismissed

O.Ayyappan v. State Represented By

2020-11-10Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 10.11.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Crl.O.P.No.17784 of 2020

1. O.Ayyappan

2. Ochappan @ Nochppan Alias ... Petitioners Vs.

The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Palladam Police Station, Palladam, Tiruppur.

(Cr.No.2220 of 2020)

...Respondent

Prayer:

Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Connection with the Crime No.2220 of 2020 pending on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : Mr.I.Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For Respondent : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 324 & 506 (ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.2220 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the due to tenant dispute, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, the petitioners have assaulted the defacto complainant with aruval on his head, as a result of which, he sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant, as a result of which he sustained injuries. He would further submit that the injured is still in Government hospital, Thirupur. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. Taking into consideration the facts and submissions of the learned Counsel and also the fact that the injured still in the hospital, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for the present.

-sd/- 10/11/2020 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

2 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALLADAM POLICE STATION, PALLADAM,TIRUPPUR.

CC to M/S I.ABRAR MOHAMED ABDULLAH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.17784/2020 Date :10/11/2020 RVR 23/11/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/