← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19429/2025disposed of

S. J.Ilamurugu v. The District Collector

2025-05-28Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.05.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE T. V. THAMILSELVI 1.S. J. Ilamurugu

2. C. Jayanthi ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The District Collector, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.

2. The Joint Director, Department of Treasuries and Accounts, Trichy - 620 001.

3. The Commissioner, Department of Treasuries and Accounts, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

4. K. Subramanian ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent not to release the retirement amount of the petitioner's father namely K. Subramanian S/o. Mr.Kandasamy working as Additional Treasury Officer, Kallakurichi after conducting enquiry based on the petitioner's 1/5

representation dated 10.12.2024 and 10.01.2025. For Petitioners :

Mr. M. Selvam For Respondents :

Mr. P. Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr. K. Makesh for R4

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to direct the 3rd respondent not to release the retirement amount of the petitioner's father namely K. Subramanian S/o. Mr.Kandasamy working as Additional Treasury Officer, Kallakurichi after conducting enquiry based on the petitioner's representations dated 10.12.2024 and 10.01.2025.

2. Heard both sides.

3. The first petitioner is the son and the second petitioner is the wife of the fourth respondent / K. Subramanian. The learned counsel for the fourth respondent submits that after the divorce, the fourth respondent got married with another woman and got one daughter. He also submits that the 2/5

second petitioner is working as a Physical Education Teacher, however, the first petitioner has been brought up by the second petitioner. She has not been paid with any maintenance. As a father, R4 not look after his son / 1st petitioner. Now, the first petitioner is aged about 25 years. All these years, the mother alone has brought up the 1st petitioner. At the verge of the retirement of the fourth respondent, the petitioners have given representations to the third respondent on 10.12.2024 and 10.01.2025 not to release his retirement amounts.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court directs the 2nd and 3rd respondent to disburse the retirement benefits by retaining a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- and the same is directed to be paid to the first petitioner after the retirement of the fourth respondent either directly through the bank account of the first petitioner or through a demand draft.

4. With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

28.05.2025 Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No 3/5

ab To

1. The District Collector, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi.

2. The Joint Director, Department of Treasuries and Accounts, Trichy - 620 001.

3. The Commissioner, Department of Treasuries and Accounts, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

4/5

T. V. THAMILSELVI. J., ab 28.05.2025 (1⁄2) 5/5