← Library
Madras High CourtWP/252/2018dismissed

M/S.Udumalpet Town Co-Op. v. The Asst. Provident Fund

2021-04-17Honourable Mr Justice S. Vaidyanathan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 17.04.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN W.P.No.252 of 2018 and WMP No.314 of 2018 M/s.Udumalpet Town Co-op. Stores Ltd., Rep. by its Secretary A.Durairaj ... Petitioner -vs1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore-641 018.

2.The Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore-641 018.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in Ref.No.TN/CBE/PDC/25841/ PROCEEDINGS/2006 dated 14.09.2006 passed by the first respondent and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.Gopalakrishnan For Respondents: Ms.R.Meenakshi

O R D E R

This Writ Petition is filed, to quash the proceedings in Ref.No.TN/CBE/PDC/25841/ PROCEEDINGS/2006 dated 14.09.2006 passed by the first respondent.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that no show cause notice and order copy have been served to the petitioner and that the petitioner has been served with the copy of the order only in the year 2017, which lead to the filing of the present Writ Petition and that there is no delay at all. This is the only point canvassed by the petitioner.

3. The Employees' Provident Fund Department has produced the document to show that the demand notice and other proceedings have already been served on the Petitioner https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Management and copy of the acknowledgement Card has also been produced wherein it has been clearly stated that the proceedings in TN/CBE/PDC/25841/RC4-CP1/PDC/2007, dated 12.04.2007 was received by the Management as early as on 25.06.2007. That being the case, the stand of the petitioner has no knowledge of any of the proceedings is far fetched. That apart, there is a delay of 13 years i.e., more than a decade in challenging the impugned order. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner and the Writ Petition is dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vum To 1.The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore-641 018.

2.The Recovery Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Dr.Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore-641 018.

+1cc to Ms.R.Meenakshi, Advocate SR.No.23266 +1cc to Mr.Gopalakrishnan, Advocate SR.No.23439 W.P.No.252 of 2018 and WMP No.314 of 2018 LN(CO) GMY(02/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/