S.Raju v. The Commissioner Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03.07.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH Crl.O.P.No.17239 of 2019

1. S.Raju

2. Servi Mosha

3. Mary Amma

...Petitioners

-Vs1. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai -07.

2. The Inspector of Police, W-16, All Women Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai.

...Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners except due process of law. For Petitioners : Mr.K.Thenrajan For Respondents : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed for a direction to the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry.

2. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents.

3. Taking into consideration the nature of the dispute involved in this case is a matrimonial dispute, it is for the parties to adjudicate the same before the appropriate Civil Court and the respondent police will have no role to play in a case of this nature.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. This Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent police not to interfere with the matrimonial dispute and it is open for the parties to agitate their rights before the competent civil court. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msrm To

1. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai -07.

2. The Inspector of Police, W-16, All Women Police Station, Pulianthope, Chennai.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Madras.

+1 cc to Mr.K.Thenrajan, Advocate, S.R.No.56582 Crl.O.P.No.17239 of 2019 KS(CO) SSM(25/07/2019).

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/