← Library
Madras High CourtWP/8036/2015disposed of

S.Saravanan v. The State Commissioner For

2015-03-23Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 23.03.2015

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM WP.No.8036 of 2015 & MP.No.1/2015 MP.No.1 of 2015 S. Saravanan ...

Petitioner

Versus

1.The State Commissioner for Differently abled persons, Office of the State Commissioner for Differently abled persons.

SRDC, Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Ring Road, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 0078.

2. The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation, Ribbon Building, Chennai - 600 003.

3. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

.. Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of mandamus or any other Writ or Direction to second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated:11.03.2015 and grant permission for running bunk shop at New No.6, Old No.11, Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. For Petitioner :

Mr. K.K.Kabilan For Respondent 1 :

Mr. M.L.Mahendran, GA For Respondents 2&3 :

Mr. P.V.Selvakumar

ORDER

Heard Mr.K.Kabilan, learned counsel for the petitioner;

Mr.M.K.Mahendran, learned Government Advocate accepting notice for the 1st respondent, Mr.P.V.Selvakumar, learned counsel accepting notice for the respondents 2 and 3 and with their consent, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself. 2.The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider his representation for the grant of license to run the bunk shop at No.6, Old No.11, Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai-31.

3.The petitioner claims to be a physically challenged person. He is running bunk shop in the place mentioned above However, according to the petitioner, the officials of the respondents are interfering with his business in running the bunk shop and are trying to evict him. Therefore, the petitioner gave representations to the 2nd respondent and thereafter, has come up with the above writ petition. 4.According to the learned Standing counsel for the Corporation, roads and bus routes vest with the Corporation. 5.In view of the said submission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 11.03.2015 on merits and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till then, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar AP To 1.The State Commissioner for Differently abled persons, Office of the State Commissioner for Differently abled persons.

SRDC, Jawaharlal Nehru Inner Ring Road, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 600 0078.

2. The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation, Ribbon Building, Chennai - 600 003.

3. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

1 cc to Government Pleader,Sr.No16333 WP.No.8036 of 2015 rsy(co) pmk.7.4.2015