← Library
Madras High CourtWP/32578/2014disposed of

V.Jeevabharathi v. The Director General Of Police

2019-01-18Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.01.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.32578 of 2014 V.Jeevabharathi ... Petitioner -Vs1. The Director General of Police, O/o. the Director General of Police, Chennai.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, O/o. the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Villupuram Range, Villupuram.

3. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

4. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

5. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District.

6. The Inspector of Police, Uthangarai Police Station, Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District.

7. A. Balasubramaniam

8. Appasamy

9. A.Murugammal

10. A.Durai Sundar

11. A.Sudha ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the 5th respondent, who is not ready to take any action against the respondents 7 to 11 and direct the 5th respondent to register a case based on petitioner complaint dated 22.09.2014 and to transfer the same to the 6th respondent for further investigation and to file a final report within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court based upon the petitioner's representation dated 13.10.2014.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kumara Devan For R1 to R6 : Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz Additional Public Prosecutor For R7 to R11 : Mr.V.Nicholas and Mr.N.E.A.Dinesh

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed directing the Respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the 5th respondent, who is not ready to take any action against the respondents 7 to 11 and direct the 5th respondent to register a case based on petitioner complaint dated 22.09.2014 and to transfer the same to the 6th respondent for further investigation and to file a final report within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court based upon the petitioner's representation dated 13.10.2014.

2. The relief as sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted by this Court. If no action taken by the respondent police based on the complaint given by the petitioner, the petitioner is necessarily to work out her remedy in accordance with the guidelines given by the judgment of the Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.13681 of 2018 and batch of cases, dated 20.09.2018.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

ssr/kal To

1. The Director General of Police, O/o. the Director General of Police, Chennai.

2. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, O/o. the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Villupuram Range, Villupuram.

3. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

4. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Krishnagiri District, Krishnagiri.

5. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Chengalpet, Kancheepuram District.

6. The Inspector of Police, Uthangarai Police Station, Uthangarai, Krishnagiri District.

7. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1 cc to M/s.V.Nicholas, Advocate SR.No.4207 W.P.No.32578 of 2014 KAN(CO) CSL/06.02.2019