S.Punniyakotti v. The Registrar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.10.2015
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition Nos.32435, 32436 and 32437 of 2012 S.PUNNIYAKOTTI ... PETITIONER IN W.P.No.32435 of 2012 D.TAMIZHAN ... PETITIONER IN W.P.NO.32436 OF 2012 A.SARANYA ... PETITIONER IN W.P.No.32437 of 2012 Vs
1. THE REGISTRAR ANNA UNIVERSITY GUINDY CHENNAI 25
2. THE PRINCIPAL ARIGNAR ANNA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PENNULAR POST, SRIPERUMBUDUR TALUK KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT ... RESPONDENTS IN ALL THE WRIT PETITIONS W.P.No.32435 of 2012:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Principal Arignar Anna Institute of Science and Technology, Pennular, Sriperumpudur Taluk, the 2nd respondent herein, to return the original S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet, Higher Secondary Mark Sheet and the 1 to 4 Semester B.E (Electronics and Communication Engineering) Mark Sheets, to the petitioner.
W.P.No.32436 of 2012:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Principal Arignar Anna Institute of Science and Technology, Pennular, Sriperumpudur Taluk, the 2nd respondent herein, to return the original S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet, Higher Secondary Mark Sheet and the 1 to 4 Semester B.E (Computer Science and Engineering) Mark Sheets, to the petitioner.
W.P.No.32437 of 2012:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Principal Arignar Anna Institute of Science and Technology, Pennular, Sriperumpudur Taluk, the 2nd respondent herein, to return the original S.S.L.C. Mark Sheet, Higher Secondary Mark Sheet and the 1 to 4 Semester B.Tech. (Information and Technology) Mark Sheets, to the petitioner. For Petitioners : Mr.A.Rajendiran For Respondents : Mr.V.Shanmugasundar for R1 No Appearance for R2 C O M M O N O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners had submitted that the writ petitions may be dismissed as infructous. He had also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the writ petitions stand dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lan
To:
1. THE REGISTRAR ANNA UNIVERSITY GUINDY CHENNAI 25
2. THE PRINCIPAL ARIGNAR ANNA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, PENNULAR POST, SRIPERUMBUDUR TALUK KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT Writ Petition Nos.32435, 32436 and 32437 of 2012 TEJ(CO) CA(18/11/2015)