M/S Ashoka Associates v. S.Murugan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.09.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN O.S.A.No.154 of 2012 M/s.Ashoka Associates Partnership firm rep. by its Partner Mr.V.Manthiram, having office at No.9, Davidson Street, Chennai 600 001 ... Appellant versus 1.S.Murugan 2.Karur Vysya Bank Limited rep. by its Deputy General Manager Mr.J.Hariharan Divisional Office, KVB Towers (I Floor) No.568, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600 018.

3.Mr.S.Paramasivam Pillai 4.M/s.Pyramid Saimira Theatre Ltd., having office at No.672, 2nd Floor, Temple Towers, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

5.M/s.Pyramid Saimira Theatre Ltd., having Office at No.672, 2nd Floor, Temple Towers, Annasalai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.

6.M/s.Lavanya and Co., Proprietorship firm, rep. by Mr.N.Narayanan having office at No.245/6, R.K.Mutt Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.

7.The Hon'ble Receiver, Justice K.Swamidurai M/s.Aruna Theatre and Enterprises Pvt Ltd., No.6, Davidson Street, Chennai 600 001.

8.M/s.Aruna Theatre and Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., rep. by its Board of Directors, having regd. Office at No.3, Pillar Road, Ashoka Nagar, Chennai 600 083.

9.M/s.Annai Mookambigai Roller Flour Mills Ltd., No.6, Davidson Street, Chennai 600 001.

10.K.Muthusamy 11.N.Sankaranarayanan 12.N.Arunachalathammal 13.K.Shanmugasundaram 14.S.Ulagammal.

15.M.Sharmila 16.K.Muthukalyanasundaram 17.S.Vallinayagam 18.M.Indira Muthuvel 19.S.Anandha Saraswathi 20.M.Bagavathi 21.P.Krishnamurthy 22.B.Muthulakshmi 23.M.Sundari 24.R.Vallidevi 25.K.Muthulakshmi 26.S.Indira 27.V.Bhuvaneswari 28.K.Muthu Selvakumar 29.S.Ramalingam 30.S.Sankaran 31.S.Narayanan 32.S.Paramasivam 33.S.Selvaraj 34.M.Gomathinayagam 35.P.Muthu Rajeswari 36.G.Vasuki 37.R.Lakshmi ... Respondents Appeal filed under Order 36 Rule 1 of Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Act, against the Order dated 26.03.2012 in A.No.616 of 2011 in C.S.No.937 of 2007.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.Kumandal P.Chopra

J U D G M E N T

(Judgement of the Court was delivered by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) None appears for the appellant. It appears that the appeal itself may have become infructuous.

The Original Side Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ksr To The Sub Assistant Registrar, Original Side, High Court, Madras.

O.S.A.No.154 of 2012 TRM(CO) CA(03/10/2016)