S.Pachaiyammal v. The State Rep. By, The Inspector Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13-05-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP NO.12242 of 2026 S. Pachaiyammal ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, PEW Polur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
(Crime No.68 of 2026) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.68 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner(s) :
Mr. M. Parthasarathy For Respondent(s) :
Mr. S. Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *******
ORDER
1/6
The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Section 4(1)(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 2024 in Crime No.68 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.
The case of the prosecution is that based on a specific information, the respondent police conducted check up in the are behind the house of A1, they seized of 90 bottles of Brandy (90ml each); that upon confession of the co-accused, the petitioner was arrayed as an accused. Hence, this case.
3.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and she has been falsely implicated in this case based on the confession of the co-accused. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish substantial sureties for his due release and to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court and therefore, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.
The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing the anticipatory bail to the 2/6
petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has 28 previous cases of similar nature. He further submitted that the coaccused were arrested and released on bail. 5.
Considering the rival submissions made on both sides, the nature of offence, the fact that the co-accused were already enlarged on bail and though the petitioner has previous cases, the petitioner was granted bail in all those cases, hence this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Thiruvannamalai District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner shall stay at Villupuram and report before the Inspector of Police, Villupuram Town Police Station daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation by the respondent police; 3/6
[b] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
[c] the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
13.05.2026 stn Note :
4/6
1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.
2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.
To
1. The Judicial Magistrate, Polur, Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Inspector of Police, PEW Polur Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.
(Crime No.68 of 2026)
3. The Inspector of Police, Villupuram Town Police Station.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
P. DHANABAL , J.
stn 5/6
Crl.O.P. No.12242 of 2026 13.05.2026 6/6