M/S Servocraft Hr Solutions v. Mrs. M.G. Helen.,

in C.S.No.625 of 2018 RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

This Application has been filed to receive additional documents No.21 to 32 (12 Nos.) mentioned in the Application filed by the Applicant/Plaintiff in C.S.No.625 of 2018.

2.This Application was filed on the main ground that the Applicant was convicted and incarcerated in prison for a criminal case connected to GST.

3.Learned counsel for the Defendants would contend that the Suit was filed in the year 2018 and after six years, this Application has been filed. 4.Taking note of the reason assigned by the Applicant that he was convicted in a criminal case connected to GST and he was incarcerated in prison, I am inclined to order this Petition on condition as follows: a.With regard to Doc. Nos.1 to 4, certified copies of the said documents are permitted.

b.With regard to Doc. Nos.5 to 7, photocopies cannot be permitted, however, the Applicant is at liberty to adduce secondary evidence.

c.With regard to Doc. No.8 to 11, the same are permitted. 1/3

d.With regard to Doc. No.12, which is a computer generated online certificate, the same is permitted.

5.With regard to the relevancy of Doc. Nos.3 & 4, it has to be elicited during the cross examination of PW1 or PW2, as the case may be. In respect of Doc.Nos.6 & 7, the learned Master shall follow the procedure for marking the document as secondary evidence.

6.Subject to proof and relevancy of documents and on the above conditions, this Application is partly ordered to the extent indicated above. 02.09.2024 sai 2/3

RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN, J.

sai in C.S.No.625 of 2018 Dated: 02.09.2024 3/3