← Library
Madras High CourtWP/16840/2020withdrawn dismissed

M/S.Archana Industries v. Deputy Commissioner Of Central Taxes

2022-03-02Honourable Mr Justice R. Suresh Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.03.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Writ Petition Nos.16840, 16847 of 2020 and WMP.Nos.20888, 20889, 20905, 20907 of 2020 W.P.1264, 1269, 1272, 1275, 1276 of 2021 and WMP.Nos.1407, 1409, 1411, 1412, 1414, 1415, 1419, 1420, 1422, 1423 of 2021 ---- Writ Petition No.16840 of 2020 M/s.Archana Industries Rep. by its Partner V.Lakshmi Narayana Swamy 707, Avinashi Road Coimbatore-641 018.

.. Petitioner in W.P.16840,16847/2020 M/s. K.G.Denim Ltd, SF.NO.12/1,2,3 Sirumugai Road, Then Thirumalai,Jadayampalayam, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore-641 302.

.. Petitioner in W.P.No. 1264,1269,1272,1275,&1276/2021 Vs

1. Deputy Commissioner of Central Taxes III Division Coimbatore 641 018.

... Respondent in W.P.16840,16847/2020

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes Coonoor Devision, Coonoor.

.. Respondent in W.P.No. 1264,1269,1272,1275,&1276/2021 Prayer in W.P.No.16840 of 2020 :

India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash and set aside the impugned order No.ZX3310200038255 dated 05.10.2020 in Form GS RFD 6, passed by the respondent sanctioning a refund of Rs.37,64,441 only as against the claim for Rs.1,94,32,045 made by the petitioner, thus rejecting a total refund of Rs.1,56,67,604, passed by the respondent as the

said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary, contrary to Section 54(3) of the CGST Act and Article 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.

Prayer in W.P.No.16847 of 2020 :

India,seeking quashing and setting aside the impugned order No.zx3310200038711 Dated 05.10.2020 in Form GST RFD 6 passed by the respondent sanctioning a refund a Rs.35 56 351 only as against the claim for Rs.71 30 950 made by the petitioner thus rejecting a total refund of Rs.35 74 599 passed by the respondent as the said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary contrary to section 54 (3) of the CGST Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the constitution.

Prayer in W.P.No.1264 of 2021 :

India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus,Quashing the impugned order No. ZR3310200205166 Dated 16.10.2020 in FORM - GST - RFD - 06 for the month of October 2019 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund to the tune of Rs. 28 78 845 as the said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary contrary to Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.

Prayer in W.P.No.1269 of 2021 :

India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus Quashing the impugned order No. ZY3310200205322 Dated 16.10.2020 in FORM - GST - RFD - 06 for the month of October 2018 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund to the tune of Rs. 28 17 367 as the said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary contrary to Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.

Prayer in W.P.No.1272 of 2021 :

India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus praying Quashing the impugned order No. ZS3310200205055 Dated 16.10.2020 in FORM - GST - RFD - 06 for the month of August 2018 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund to the tune of Rs. 21 31 446 as the said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary contrary to Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.

Prayer in W.P.No.1275 of 2021 :

India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus praying Quashing the impugned order No. ZO3310200204788 Dated 16.10.2020 in FORM - GST - RFD - 06 for the month of November 2018 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund to the tune of Rs. 28 66 790 as the said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary contrary to Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution. Prayer in W.P.No.1276 of 2021 :

India, seeking a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus praying Quashing the impugned order No. ZR3310200205299 Dated 16.10.2020 in FORM - GST - RFD - 06 for the month of December 2018 passed by the respondent rejecting the refund to the tune of Rs. 16 02 099 as the said rejection of refund is clearly arbitrary contrary to Section 54 (3) of the CGST Act and Articles 14 and 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution.

For Petitioner in all the above WPs : Mr.G.Natarajan For Respondent in all the above WPs : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing counsel COMMON ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that he has got instructions to withdraw these writ petitions.

2. Recording the submission, all these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar nvsri To

1. The Deputy Commissioner of Central Taxes III Division Coimbatore 641 018

2. The Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes Coonoor Devision, Coonoor.

+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas,Senior Standing counsel Income tax, Advocate, S.R.No.14512 Writ Petition Nos.16840, 16847 of 2020 W.P.1264, 1269, 1272, 1275, 1276 of 2021 GY(CO) CT 16/03/2022