Manickam, v. Vennila,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.03.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR C.R.P.No.2059 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.15673 & 15674 of 2021

1. Manickam

2. Kalyani 3.Sulochana ... Petitioners Vs.

1.Vennila 2.Rajasekaran

...Respondents

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to call for the records pertaining to D.V.O.P.No.01 of 2018 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur and strike out the petitioners name.

For Petitioners : M/s.C.Arun Kumar For Respondent 1 : Mr.R.Marudhachalamurthy For respondents 2 : Not ready in notice 1/3

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the main domestic violence case pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur was already dismissed as not pressed and hence, the prayer in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 14.03.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No nr To The learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Mettur 2/3

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

nr C.R.P.No.2059 of 2021 and C.M.P.No.15673 & 15674 of 2021 14.03.2024 3/3