D. Kulasekaran v. B.R.R.Holdings Pvt Ltd

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Sixteenth day of July Two Thousand Nineteen PRESENT THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN CMP No.13740 of 2019 IN SA.675/2019 D. KULASEKARAN [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 B.R.R.HOLDINGS PVT LTD [ RESPONDENTS ] REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, PLOT NO.392, HMT HILLS, 2ND VENTURE, OPP OF JNTU COLLEGE, KULKATPATTY, HYDERABAD-500072 2 BSJR HOLDINGS PVT LTD.

REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, H.NO.B55, FLAT NO.202, SRI VAISHNAVI VIHAR, VENGATARAONAGAR, S.R.

NAGAR POST, HYDERABAD-500038 3 BHIMA AGRO FARMS PVT. LTD.

REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, H.NO.2-13/31, S.S.

NAGAR, OPPOSITE HYDER NAGAR, HYDERABAD - 500072 4 BRNR HOLDINGS PVT LTD.

REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, H.NO.1-11/195, FLAT NO. 503, VEMA KAMALAS PRAMILA RAO RESIDENCY SHAMLAL BUILDINGS, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD-500018 5 CHENNAI GARR TECH LTD., REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR, NO.111, 3B, Z BLOCK, 13TH STREET, ANNA NAGAR, CHENNAI-600040 6 RUKMANI DEVI Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased too fix an early date for final hearing of the Second Appeal in SA No.675/2019 and direct the Registry to list the matter accordingly (CMP.13740/2019)

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.T.V.RAMANUJAM, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR M/S.E.GOMATHI, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.T.R.RAJAGOPALAN, FOR MR.T.R.RAJARAMAN, AND MR.V.RAGHAVACHARI, Advocate for the 1 to 4 Respondents and of MR.P.L.NARAYANAN, Advocate for the 5th Respondent and of MR.S.SATHIASEELAN, Advocate for the 6th Respondent the court made the following order:- This petition has been filed to fix an early date for final hearing of the Second Appeal in S.A.No.675 of 2019. 2.The third respondent in the Second Appeal is the petitioner herein.

3.The above Second Appeal was admitted on 18.06.2019 and the substantial questions of law were framed.

4.This Court understand the anxiety of the petitioner/3rd respondent for early hearing of the Second Appeal.

5. However, taking into consideration, the entirety of facts and the Second Appeal was admitted recently, I am not inclined to grant the relief sought for.

6. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 16/07/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar ( Statistics / C.S. ) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE SESSIONS JUDGE, MAHILA COURT, CHENGALPATTU.

2 THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, TAMBARAM.

+ 2 C.C. to M/S.E.GOMATHI Advocate SR.NO.8851 Order in CMP.13740/2019 in SA.675/2019 Date :16/07/2019 From 26.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified copies of the Interim Orders in this format RRI 17/07/2019