D.Shanthi v. The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 22.09.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.O.P. No.20219 of 2016 D.Shanthi ... Petitioner Vs The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police Tiruchengode Town Police Station Tiruchengode.

... Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying for direction to the respondent not to harass the petitioner.

For Petitioner : M/s.RM.Venkatesh For Respondent : Mr.C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

Seeking a direction to the respondent police not to harass the petitioner, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

2. This petition has come up today for admission. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent and I have also perused the records carefully.

3. In my considered opinion, no blanket direction as prayed for by the petitioner could be given. If the petitioner is wanted either for enquiry or for interrogation, she can very well be summoned by the respondent police and while doing so, the petitioner shall not be harassed. At the same time, the petitioner should submit herself to the respondent for interrogation and enquiry.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS II) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Inspector of Police Tiruchengode Town Police Station Tiruchengode.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.Venkatesh, Advocate, S.R.No.54755 CRL.O.P. No.20219 of 2016 (CO)LRS CP(20/10/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/