J.Jayachandran v. The Secretary To Government
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.10.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 1.J.Jayachandran 2.S.Sellappan 3.M.Ramu 4.A.Azeezur Rahiman 5.M.Thayanithi 6.P.Venkatachalam 7.V.Sundaram 8.S.Pattusami 9.J.Sekar 10.L.Anbalagan 11.K.Aranganathan 12.R.Venkatesan 13.N.Meganathan 14.P.Parameswaran 15.B.Kubera Shanmugam 16.R.Panner Selvam 17.K.Anbarasu 18.N.Nagarajan 19.K.Natarajan 20.N.Lakshmanan 21.M.V.Karvenkadam 22.S.Syed Anwar Batsha 23.P.Subbaiah 24.N.Thiagarajan 25.G.Ramasamy 26.R.Nedumaran 1/7
27.O.M.Palanisamy 28.P.Subramanian 29.A.Thangamuthu 30.K.Chinnaswamy Krishnan 31.P.Shanmugam 32.C.Mahendran 33.V.Padmanabhan 34.E.R.Subramanian 35.K.N.Shanmugam 36.A.J.Mathan 37.H.B.Ramakrishnan 38.K.Thirunavukkarasu 39.M.Govindaswamy 40.S.Asokan 41.G.Venkatachalam 42.K.R.Veerappan 43.R.Subramaniam 44.P.Rangasamy 45.K.Veerappan 46.M.Mani 47.K.Ramasami 48.A.Sidthamalai 49.P.Muthusamy 50.K.Appavoo 51.M.Devedoss 52.M.Sengottaiyan 53.N.Mallikarajunan 54.C.Purushothaman 55.K.S.Subramaniam 56.P.Vijayamoorthi 57.P.Thailappan 58.K.V.Sundara Soundappan 59.J.Raja 60.N.Santhana Krishnan 61.R.Gopalakrishnan 62.K.V.Natesan 63.V.Ranganathan 2/7
64.V.Krishnanraju 65.R.Gnanamoorthy 66.N.Palaniappan 67.K.Subramanian 68.M.Mohamed Yousuf Sait 69.P.Subramanian 70.M.Palaniappan 71.R.Varatharajan 72.V.Kaliaperumal 73.V.Sivashanmugam 74.S.Krishnamoorthy 75.S.Anbazhagan 76.N.Adbul Raheem 77.S.Subbiah 78.M.Sabapathy 79.K.Durairaj 80.M.Durairajan 81.S.Loganathan 82.S.Sankaran 83.G.Godhandapani 84.K.Thiruvalluvan 85.K.Kannan 86.B.Krishnasamy 87.A.Venkatachalam ...
Petitioners versus 1.The Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Secretary to Government, Agriculture Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
3.The Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
3/7
4.The Director of Horticulture, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
5.The Director of Agriculture Marketing & Agriculture Business, Guindy, Chennai.
6.The Director of Organic Certification Department & Seed Certification Department, Coimbatore.
...
Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records in pursuant to the impugned G.O.(Ms.)No.242 Finance (Paycell) Department dated 22.07.2013 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to pay the enhanced scale of pay to all the petitioners as per G.O.(Ms.)No.448 Finance (Paycell) Department dated 31.12.2010 with all monetary benefits including arrears. For Petitioners :
Mr.N.Om Prakash for Mr.R.Prem Narayan For Respondents :
Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu Additional Government Pleader
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
4/7
2.
In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
30.10.2024 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No sri 5/7
To 1.The Secretary to Government, Finance Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Secretary to Government, Agriculture Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
3.The Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
4.The Director of Horticulture, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.
5.The Director of Agriculture Marketing & Agriculture Business, Guindy, Chennai.
6.The Director of Organic Certification Department & Seed Certification Department, Coimbatore.
6/7
G.ARUL MURUGAN , J.
sri and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 30.10.2024 7/7