R.Somasundaram v. The Principal Secretary To
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee Tuesday, the 07th day of September, 2021 LOK ADALAT AWARD (Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE MALAI SUBRAMANIAN (Retd.) and Member Mr.K. Balasubramanian, District Judge (Retd.,) W.P.No.13025 of 2014 and W.M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 (This writ petition is praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the G.O.(Ms) No 40, Transport (D) Department Dated 16.04.2014 on the file of the 1st respondent and note No.E1/999/TNSTC(S)/2011 dated 23.04.2014 issued by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the Respondents to pay House Rent Allowance drawn by the Petitioners all along from 01.06.2009 as per G.O.(MS.No.
234 Transport Department, dated 01.06.2009.) 1.R.Somasundaram 2.S.Balasubramanian 3.K.Chellamuthu 4.K.Rathinam 5.D.Kumar 6.D.Laxman 7.S.Jeevarathinam 8.S.Chinnusamy 9.S.K.Jeeva 10.K.Madheswaran 11.A.Mohanraja 12.P.Chandramohan 13.G.K.Sivamani 14.M.S.Loganathan 15.R.Asokan 16.S.Ramasamy 17.K.Baskaran 18.K.Kangeyan 19.S.Veerappan 20.P.Jaganathan 21.K.Kangesan 22.N.Rajendran 23.R.
24.M.Panneerselvam 25.K.Baskaran 26.R.Ravichandran 27.R.Sekar 28.M.Govindasamy 29.T.Gunasekaran 30.M.Shunmugavadivu 31.A.Thiyagarajan 32.N.Kalaivanan 33.V.Chandrasekaran 34.D.Annadurai 35.P.Shanmugam 36.K.Muthukaruppan 37.S.Mayakrishnan 38.R.Raju 39.N.Arumugam 40.P.Ravindran 41.A.Arumugham 42.P.Senguttuvan 43.N.Ramesh 44.P.Selvakumar 45.M.Murugan 46.M.K.Sundram 47.A.Jayakumar 48.T.Mohankumar 49.M.Aravindan 50.V.K.Jayabalu 51.G.Arunmozhi 52.s.Rangan 53.K.Rajarajan 54.R.Balasubramanian 55.R.Mahendran 56.V.Paneerselvam ...
Petitioners Vs.
1.The Principal Secretary to Government Transport Department, St.Fort George, Chennai - 9.
2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem & District.
...
Respondents
This case came up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Petitioner No.11 & 18 and Mr.D.Raghu, the learned counsel for the second respondent are present in Lok Adalat. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows: TERMS OF SETTLEMENT The petitioners have filed writ of certiorari mandamus for quashing G.O.Ms.No.40 Transport (D) Department dated 16.04.2014. Pending finality of the writ petition, petitioner No.11 Thiru.Mohanraja and petitioner No.18.Thiru.K.Kangeyan both did not want to press their request further. Accordingly, in so far as the petitioner Nos.11 & 18 are concerned, the writ petition stands disposed of as not pressed. No costs. Consequently,connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. A.Mohanraja (Petitioner No.11) K.Kangeyan (Petitioner No.18)
The Management, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, 12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem - 7.
Counsel for the second respondent Judge Member To:The parties/Advocate concerned Copy to:
1.The Principal Secretary to Government Transport Department, St.Fort George, Chennai - 9.
2.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation, (Salem) Ltd., 12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem & District.
3.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 4.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. 5.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies adl/sms
MALAI SUBRAMANIAN, J. (Retd.) adl/sms W.P.No.13025 of 2014 and W.M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014 07.09.2021