Ankur Khandelwal v. State Rep By,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.01.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.18950 of 2020 1.Ankur Khandelwal 2.Brij Khandelwal 3.Raj Khandelwal ... Petitioners/Accused -Vs1.The State rep. by, Investigation Officer, Mahila Police Station, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.State Represented by Inspector of Police, G-3, Kilpauk Police Station, Kilpauk, Chennai.

... Respondent/Complainant Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the case pending investigation in Crime No.Not known of 2020, on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(Heard through video conference) The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the 2nd respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 494 & 377 of IPC, in Crime No.Not Known of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. Today, this matter is listed for third time for hearing. The learned counsel for the petitioners did not appear for the past two hearings. Even, today, there is no representation on behalf of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

learned counsel for the petitioners. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed for default.

-sd/- 18/01/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1.INVESTIGATION OFFICER,MAHILA POLICE STATION, RAIPUR,CHHATTISHGARH, 2.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,G-3,KILPAUK POLICE STATION,KILPAUK,CHENNAI.

3.THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S.J.SURESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.18950/2020 Date :18/01/2021 KSM27/01/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/