← Library
Madras High Court/12458/2026granted

T Aridoss v. The State Rep By Inspector Of Police,

2026-05-13Honourable Mr.Justice P. Dhanabal5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13-05-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL T.Aridoss S/o.Thanathipathi ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by Inspector of Police, M1- Viruthachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District- 606001 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.185 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. For Petitioner(s):

Mr.S.Tamizh Selvan For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 115(2), 132 of BNSS, 2023 in Crime No.185 of 2026 and Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Medical Service Person and Medical Service Institutions (Prevention of Violence and Damage or Loss to Property Act, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the alleged incident occurred on 05.04.2026 around 4.00 p.m., and the petitioner along with other accused assaulted the ward boy of Government Hospital at Viruthachalam. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed anticipatory bail for the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner is having no previous case. He further submitted that the petitioner was arrested and released on bail and accused No.2 was granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Court. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on

either side, the nature of offences and also the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and no previous case is pending against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate-I at Viruthachalam on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday at 10.00 a.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;

[b] the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; [c] the petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned

Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNSS, 2023.

13-05-2026 MKA/SHA To:

1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Viruthachalam.

2.The Inspector of Police, M1- Viruthachalam Police Station, Cuddalore District- 606001.

3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

P.DHANABAL J.

MKA/SHA Crl. OP. No.12458 of 2026 13-05-2026