Asaraf Ali @ Umar v. State Rep By

Crl.OP.No.17490 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.17490 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioners who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 341, 364 and 307 of IPC, in Crime No.302 of 2022, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there was a land dispute between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioners kidnapped the defacto complainant and threatened him at the knife point. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners are the sons of the defacto complainant. He would further submit that there is no change of circumstances after the previous dismissal order passed by this Court. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.17490 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the bad antecedent of the petitioners, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 26.07.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.17490 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis