R.Chittibabu, Male/34 Years v. The State Represented By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Third day of May Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P. RAJAMANICKAM CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.13596 of 2018 R.CHITTIBABU, [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-1, SEMBIUM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 600 011.
CR.NO.592/2018 For Petitioner : M/S.M.UMA SHANKAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. T.P. SAVITHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 294(b) and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.592 of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Heard both sides.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to wordy quarrel, a false case has been foisted against the petitioner. He further submitted that already a counter case has been registered. He also further submitted that the defacto complainant has sustained only simple injuries and she has already been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent fairly conceded that the defacto complainant has sustained only simple injuries and she has already been discharged from the hospital. She has also submitted that the counter case is also pending.
5.Considering the aforesaid submissions, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Now at Allikulam, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(i) if the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days, this order shall stand automatically cancelled.
(ii) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required before the respondent police for interrogation.
(iii) the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. (iv) the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
(v) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
(vi) If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 23/05/2018 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.V, EGMORE AT ALLIKULAM 2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE [FOR INFORMATION]
3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-1, SEMBIUM POLICE STATION, CHENNAI 600 011.
+1 CC to M/S.M.UMA SHANKAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO. 9375 CRL OP.13596/2018 Date :23/05/2018 TA-24/05/2018