J.Mayilvaganam v. State, Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14-05-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL J.Mayilvaganam S/o.Jothilingam, No,3/70, Pillayar Koil Street, Katharikuppam Village, Anaicut Taluk, Vellore District.

..Petitioner(s) Vs State, rep. by The Inspector of police, Veppankuppam Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No. 282 of 2025) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : To enlarge the Petitioner on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with in Crime No. 282 of 2025 on the file of Respondent Police and thus render justice.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R. Sasikumar For Respondent(s):

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2), 326(a) of B.N.S. 2023 (Section 379 & 430 of IPC) r/w. Section 21(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in connection with the case in Crime No.282 of

2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has illegally transported 1 Unit of River Sand in a Mini Tipper Lorry bearing registration No.TN 23 CM 4477. Hence the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and that the custodial interrogation is not required in this case and hence prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and further submitted that, apart from this case, the petitioner has six previous cases and hence, he strongly opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent police and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of allegations and considering the nature and quantity of minerals involved in this case, the fact that though the petitioner has six previous cases already two previous cases were disposed of and remaining four cases were not similar in nature, and in all cases he is on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Vellore District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

14-05-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order MTL/SSB

Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Vellore District 2.The Inspector of police, Veppankuppam Police Station, Vellore District.

(Crime No. 282 of 2025) 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

P.DHANABAL, J.

MTL/SSB 14-05-2026