Vivekanandan v. The State Rep By Its,

Crl.OP.No.17827 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.17827 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.84 of 2020, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, due to previous enmity, the petitioner along with other accused had attacked the defacto complainant and also threatened with dire consequences. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence. He would further submit that, due to previous enmity, false complaint has been lodged and hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.17827 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Sma

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner is an habitual offender and there are 14 previous cases pending against him, hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the bad antecedents of the petitioner ie, there are 14 previous cases pending against him, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 01.08.2022 Sma Crl.O.P.No.17827 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis