S.Sivaprakash, v. The Inspector Of General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.15545 of 2018 S.Sivaprakash ...

Petitioner -vs1. The Inspector General of Registration Mylapore Chennai

2. The Sub Registrar Punjai Puliyampatti Sub Registrar office Sathyamangalam Erode District ... Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the second respondent in Check Memo No.1/2018 dated 23.04.2018 and quash the same and further direct the second respondent to register the Settlement Deed executed by the petitioner dated 23.04.2018 within a stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioner:: Mr.S.Parthasarathy For Respondents:: Mr.T.M.Pappiah Special Government Pleader

ORDER

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner for sometime, the learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to produce any proof from his side to show that the petitioner had https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

already issued notice to the other side informing that the four months time fixed in the sale agreement stood expired, therefore, he is entitled to go for executing the settlement deed. It is at this stage, the learned counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to issue notice and do the needful. Recording his statement, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ss To

1. The Inspector General of Registration, Mylapore, Chennai.

2. The Sub Registrar, Punjai Puliyampatti, Sub Registrar office, Sathyamangalam, Erode District.

+1cc to M/S.S.Parthasarathy, Advocate Sr.41159 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.41440 W.P.No.15545 of 2017 bs[co] srg 11/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/