← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19419/2026disposed of

R.Ramesh v. The Director Of Adi Dravidar Welfare

2026-05-13Honourable Mrs.Justice L.Victoria Gowri4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 13-05-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and WMP.Nos.20701 & 20702 of 2026

1. R.Ramesh S/o. Rangaraj, Indira Colony, Siruvanur post, Manachanallur Taluk, Trichy 621 105 Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Director of Adi Dravidar welfare Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 05 2.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal welfare officer Perambalur district Respondent(s) PRAYER call for the records on the file of the 1st respondent in connection with the order of suspension passed by him in his proceedings in Rc. No. C3/ 21200/ 2024 dated 12.09.2024 and the order passed by him in his proceeding in Na.Ka.No. C3/ 21200/ 2024 dated 9.03.2026 and quash the same and direct the respondent to give posting to the petitioner with all monetary and service benefits. 1 / 4

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.R.Singaravelan, Senior Counsel for Ms.Brindha Parthasarathy For Respondent(s):

Mr.P.Balathandayutham Special Government Pleader

ORDER

Seeking to quash the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 12.09.2024 in Rc.No.C3/ 21200/ 2024 and proceedings dated 09.03.2026 in Na.Ka.No.C3/21200/ 2024 and for a consequent direction to the respondents to give posting to the petitioner with all monetary and service benefits, this writ petition is filed.

2.The plight of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner is that pursuant to the suspension of the petitioner, the available remedy of revision is not informed to the petitioner and hence, the order of suspension is not permitted to be reviewed. In view of the same, the petitioner insisted that his suspension should be reviewed in the light of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.1366 of 2022 dated 30.06.2022 and W.A.No.1657 of 2019 dated 31.07.2023.

3.The learned Special Government Pleader submitted that the petitioner may make a fresh representation to the respondents in this regard and on receipt of the fresh representation, orders will be passed on merits. 2 / 4

4.In view of the above submissions, the petitioner is directed to make a fresh representation in this regard to the respondents and on receipt of the same, the respondents are directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of the fresh representation after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5.In the result, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 13-05-2026 krk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The Director of Adi Dravidar welfare Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai 05 2.The District Adi Dravidar and Tribal welfare officer Perambalur district 3 / 4

L.VICTORIA GOWRI J.

krk WP No. 19419 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.20701 & 20702 of 2026 13-05-2026 4 / 4