Madras High CourtCRP NPD/858/2006dismissed for nonprosecution

Mangalam v. Sakunthala

2017-12-19Honourable Mr Justice M.V. Muralidaran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:19.12.2017

CORAM

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN CRP(NPD)Nos.858 and 859 of 2006 and C.M.P.No.7013 of 2006 and Caveat No.904 of 2006 1.Mangalam 2.Rajagopal .. Petitioners in both CRPs vs.

1.Sakunthala 2.K.Krishnamurthy 3.Malliga 4.K.Sankar (Minor) (rep by his mother and natural guardian Sakunthala) 5.Pazhani 6.Lakshmi 7.D.Angamuthu 8.T.Elango 9.Kamatchi 10.Saroja 11.A.B.Somu 12.A.B.Panchatcharam 13.A.B.Mani @ A.B.Marimuthu 14.A.B.Bhavani .. Respondents in both CRPs PRAYER IN CRP.No.858 of 2006:

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C, against the fair and final order passed by XV Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 31.12.2004 made in I.A.No.18475 of 2003 in O.S.No.5634 of 1989.

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.

ub PRAYER IN CRP.No.859 of 2006:

Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of C.P.C, against the fair and final order passed by XV Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 31.12.2004 made in I.A.No.18476 of 2003 in O.S.No.5634 of 1989.

For Petitioner in both CRPs :No Appearance For Respondents in both CRPs :M/s.R.Selvakumar for R5 C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter came up before this Court on 18.12.2017, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it was adjourned today i.e., 01912.2017 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 19.12.2017 ub To The XV Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

http://www.judis.nic.in CRP(NPD)Nos.858 and 859 of 2006