D.Suresh Kumar v. S.Menaka

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.10.2019 CORAM :

The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.R.P.No.4392 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 D.Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

S.Menaka ... Respondent Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decreetal order dated 25.09.2014 made in I.A.No.20 of 2014 in O.S.No.12121 of 2010 on the file of 18th Additional City Civil Court Chennai.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy For Respondents : No appearance

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the suit in O.S.No.12121 of 2010 on the file of the 18th Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai, itself was decreed on 19.12.2016. Hence, the relief sought for in the Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar va Page 1 / 2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To The 18th Additional Judge, City Civil Court Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.S.Vijaya Kumar, Advocate sr.87655 C.R.P.No.4392 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 vd(co) nr 19/11/2019 Page 2 / 2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/