Vinoth Kumar v. The State Rep By Its,

Crl.OP.No.17549 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.17549 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC, in Crime No.204 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused robbed the gold chain which belongs to the defacto complainant's mother. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and no way connected with the alleged offence. He would further the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and hence he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submit that there are twenty five previous cases pending against the petitioner and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.OP.No.17549 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

Sma

5. Taking into consideration the allegations and also the bad antecedent of the petitioner and that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is very much required, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 27.07.2022 Sma Crl.O.P.No.17549 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis