Amman Enterprises v. Thaiyalnayagi (Died)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.03.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN C.R.P.(PD) Nos.4555 and 4556 of 2014 C.R.P.(PD) No.4555 of 2014:

Amman Enterprises, rep. by its Partners,

1. Ramalingam

2. Parthiban (Died)

3. Palani

4. Umaram

5. Dayalan

6. Indira No.127 Arcot Road, Chennai 600 092.

... Petitioners vs.

1.

Thaiyalnayagi (died) 2.

Seethalakshmi 3.

Parthiban 4.

S.Bhuvaneswari 5.

Ladbai 6.

Venkatachala Reddiar 7.

G.Rajeswari 8.

Mithila 9.

Hamsaveni 10.

Venkatasamy 11.

Visalakshi 12.

Krishnaveni Ammal (Died) 13.

Krishnaveni (Died) 14.

Hemavathy 15.

Selvanayagi 16.

Thiruvambal 17.

Malliga 18.

Pattammal (Died) 19.

Venkatachenna Reddiar 20.

Santha ..Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of Page No.1 of 4

India, seeking to set aside the docket order made in O.S.No.7213 of 2006 on the file of the III Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, dated 28.10.2014 in insisting the Plaintiff to produce P.W.5 and P.W.6 in pursuance of allowing the Application filed by the Respondents 2 and 3/Defendants 2 and 3 for recalling those witnesses.

C.R.P.(PD) No.4556 of 2014:

Amman Enterprises, rep. by its Partners,

1. Ramalingam

2. Parthiban (Died)

3. Palani

4. Umaram

5. Dayalan

6. Indira No.127 Arcot Road, Chennai 600 092.

... Petitioners vs.

1.

Seethalakshmi 2.

Parthiban ... Respondents Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to set aside the docket order made in O.S.No.1480 of 2005 on the file of the III Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai, dated 28.10.2014 in insisting the Plaintiff to produce P.W.5 and P.W.6 in pursuance of allowing the Application filed by the Respondents 2 and 3/Defendants 2 and 3 for recalling those witnesses.

* * * * * For Petitioner in both cases :

Mr.V.Ayyadurai For Respondent 2 & 3 in both cases :

Mr.G.Pookundran C.R.P.(PD) No.4555/2014:

Respondents in 1, 12, 13 & 18 :

Died Respondents 4, 5, 7, 11, 14, 15 & 20 :

No such addressee Respondents 8, 9, 10 & 17 :

No appearance For Respondents 6, 16, 19 :

Died (Steps not taken) * * * * * Page No.2 of 4

C O M M O N O R D E R When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that, nothing survives for consideration in these cases. He has also made an endorsement in the case bundle to that effect.

2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioners, as nothing further survives for consideration, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected M.P.Nos.1 and 1 of 2014 in the above Civil Revision Petitions, are closed.

06.03.2020 Index :

Yes/No (aeb) To: The III Assistant City Civil Judge, Chennai. Page No.3 of 4

S.VAIDYANATHAN,J.

(aeb) 06.03.2020 Page No.4 of 4