← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/13686/2018dismissed

A.Ayyanar, Aged 59 Years v. The State Of Tamil Nadu

2018-06-06Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 06.06.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.13686 of 2018 A.Ayyanar ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-4.

3.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-7.

4.The Inspector of Police, R-4 Soundarapandiyanar Bazar Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai-17.

5.The Inspector of Police, R-1 Mambalam Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai-17.

... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to harass the petitioner and his family members. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pugalenthi For Respondents : Ms.P.Kritika Kamal Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed to direct the 4th and 5th respondents not to harass the petitioner.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondents and perused the materials placed on record.

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that a regular case in Crime No.364 of 2018 is pending against the petitioner on the file of the 4th respondent. Similary, a regular case in Crime No.30 of 2018 is pending against the petitioner before the 5th respondent. She also submitted that there are other criminal cases pending against the petitioner, which are Crime Nos.2405 of 2013 and 2507 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent and that, history sheet has been opened against him. 4.Mr.Pugalenthi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that even though the petitioner has been released on bail, he is being called by the respondent Police very frequently, under the guise of enquiry.

5.Be that as it may. In view of the law laid down by this court, in the case of Dorand and Others Vs the Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District and another in Crl.O.P. [MD] No.1727 of 2016 decided on 01.02.2016, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted.

Hence, this petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar gya To 1.Secretary to the Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.The Director General of Police, Kamarajar Salai, Chennai-4.

3.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai, Vepery, Chennai-7.

4.The Inspector of Police, R-4 Soundarapandiyanar Bazar Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai-17.

5.The Inspector of Police, R-1 Mambalam Police Station, T.Nagar, Chennai-17.

6.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.P.Pugalenthi, Advocate Sr.35084 Crl.O.P.No.13686 of 2018 na[co] srg 14/06/2018