Keerthana v. The State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.23615 of 2014 Keerthana

...Petitioner

Vs 1.

The State rep by The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.

The State, represented by the Inspector of Police, Arani Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

3.

C. Mohanraj,

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 2 to provide police protection to the petitioner and her husband family pursuant to her representation dated 25.08.2014. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Meiyappan For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abimanyu Government Advocate for R1 & R2

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

2.This matter was heard through video conference and therefore, no endorsement was made in the bundle. 3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, permission is granted to withdraw the case and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msr To 1.

The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Tiruvannamalai District.

2.

The Inspector of Police, Arani Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.30224 W.P.No.23615 of 2014 UM(CO) BE(30/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/