P.Periyasamy v. The District Collector
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR P.Periyasamy ... Petitioner vs.
1. The District Collector Office of the Collectorate Salem District
2. The District Revenue Officer Office of the Collectorate Salem District
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Taluk Salem District
4. The Tahsildar Office of Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District
5. Periyadurai
6. Manickam
7. Ramachandiran
8. Murugan Page Nos.1/7
9. Shanthi
10. Devagi
11. Chinnaponnu 12.Azhaguvel
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents authorities 2 to 4 to remove the encroachment made by the Respondents 5 to 12 in S.Nos.256/5, 311/3, 312/2, 319/1B Vellaiyur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District in the light of G.O.Ms.No.64 dated 08.02.2022 after conducting proper enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 02.05.2025 made by the petitioner.
For petitioner :
Mr. S.Maharajan For Respondents :
Mr.T.K.Saravanan Additional Govt. Pleader for R1 to R4
ORDER
[made by M.SUNDAR, J.] This order will now dispose of the captioned 'writ petition' ['WP' for the sake of brevity].
Page Nos.2/7
2.
Mr. S.Maharajan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, is before us on the 'VC' ['Videoconferencing'] platform. 3.
Adverting to a representation dated 02.05.2025 from the writ petitioner, learned counsel for writ petitioner, submitted that there are alleged encroachments in 'Government land in S.Nos.256/5, 311/3, 312/2 and 319/1B in Vellaiyur Village, Thalaivasal Taluk, Salem District' [hereinafter 'said lands' for the sake of convenience and clarity] by R5 to R12. To be noted, R5 to R12 are private respondents. 4.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case in juxtaposition with G.O.(Ms)No.64, Revenue and Disaster Management Department, Land Disposal Wing, dated 08.02.2022 {hereinafter 'said GO' for the sake of convenience} which puts in place a removal of encroachment procedure inter alia giving opportunity to alleged encroachers, we are of the view that the captioned WP can be disposed of by ordering notice to official respondents (R1 to R4) and putting in a safety valve / adequate protection qua alleged encroachers i.e. R5 to R12.
Page Nos.3/7
5.
Issue notice to official respondents, i.e.,R1 to R4. 6.
Mr. T.K. Saravanan, learned Additional Government Pleader, accepts notice for R1 to R4.
7.
In the light of what has been alluded to supra and considering the limited scope of the captioned WP, with the consent of both sides, captioned WP was taken up.
8.
It was submitted by learned State counsel that said GO has been put in place, wherein and whereby Divisional Monitoring Committee, District Monitoring Committee and State Steering Committee have been constituted inter alia for a single point reporting / monitoring system qua Government lands.
9.
In the light of the narrative thus far, we deem it appropriate to refer the matter to the Divisional Monitoring Committee headed by R3 qua said GO.
10.
We direct the jurisdictional Divisional Monitoring Committee to examine if there is encroachment qua said lands. Page Nos.4/7
11.
The Divisional Monitoring Committee qua said GO shall (if it comes to the conclusion that there is encroachment), report the encroachment to appropriate authorities concerned for further action (for removal of encroachment). In this regard, we are acutely conscious that the matter is being disposed of in Admission Board without notice to alleged encroachers and therefore, this safety valve is put in place. To be noted, all the rights and contentions of alleged encroachers are preserved for being raised before the Committee concerned which shall consider the same on their own merits and in accordance with law untrammelled by this proceedings in this Court. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 14 weeks from today i.e., by 25.09.2025.
12.
It is open to the writ petitioner and or anyone concerned with this matter to come to this Court on the same issue even with a similar / same prayer if there is any change of circumstances. 13.
We make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion as to whether there is encroachment or not qua said lands as it Page Nos.5/7
turns on facts and it is for the Divisional Monitoring Committee to take a call on this aspect of the matter. We also make it clear that this exercise will not apply to patta land and it will apply only to public land, if there is any encroachment in public land. 14.
Captioned WP is disposed of with the aforementioned observations and directives in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.
(M.S., J.) (H.C., J.) 19.06.2025 Index :
Yes/No Yes/No gpa To
1. The District Collector Office of the Collectorate Salem District
2. The District Revenue Officer Office of the Collectorate Salem District
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Attur Taluk Salem District
4. The Tahsildar Office of Tahsildar Thalaivasal Taluk Salem District Page Nos.6/7
M.SUNDAR, J.
and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.
gpa 19.06.2025 Page Nos.7/7