R.Chinnarangan v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 06.07.2016 Coram:

The Honourable Mr.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE and The Honourable Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.23244 of 2016 R.Chinnarangan ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Collector, Namakkal District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

3.The Tahsildar, Tiruchengode Taluk, Tiruchengode, Namakkal.

4.Rangasamy ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on merits by disposing the written representation made by the petitioner on 06.01.2016 within a stipulated time.

For Petitioner ::: T.E.Badrinathan For Respondents ::: Mr.S.T.S.Murthi Special Government Pleader assisted by Mr.V.Shanmugasundaram

O R D E R

(The Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble The Chief Justice) On hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it is directed that the allegation of the petitioner of there being a common pathway in S.No.390/1, Thokkavadi Village, Tiruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District, be verified, as also the allegation of encroachment by the 4th respondent, by the third respondent/Tahsildar on site inspection and if any encroachments https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

are found, action in accordance with law be taken after notice to all concerned.

2. The aforesaid exercise will be completed within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the order.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Namakkal District.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.

3.The Tahsildar, Tiruchengode Taluk, Tiruchengode, Namakkal.

+1 cc to Mr.T.E.Badrinathan Advocate sr.38479 W.P.No.23244 of 2016 aa23/07/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/