← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19647/2019disposed of

Dr.K.Suganthi v. The Director

2019-11-06Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.19647 of 2019 And W.M.P.Nos.19174 and 19175 of 2019 K.Suganthi ... Petitioner Vs.

The Director of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services DMS Compound Anna Salai Chennai - 600 006.

... Respondent Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in Roc.No.29079/L1/2017 dated 14.07.2017 on the file of the respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondent herein to reinstate me into service with all service benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in Roc. No.29079/L1/2017 dated 14.07.2017 on the file of the respondent herein and to quash the same and to direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all service benefits.

2.Heard the arguments advanced on either side. 3.The case of the petitioner is that a case was registered against him in Crime No.07/AC/2017/VPM on 29.06.2017 for the alleged offence under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and was arrested on 30.06.2017 and thereafter released 1/4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

on bail on the same day. Thereafter the petitioner was placed under suspension vide order dated 14.07.2017. Though the suspension order was issued in the year 2017, the same has not yet been revoked. The petitioner in this regard made representation to the respondent on 15.11.2017 requesting to revoke the order of suspension, however, the same has not yet been considered. Hence, this writ petition.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that without going into the merits of the case, it would suffice, if this Court issues direction to the respondent to consider the representation dated 15.11.2017 and to pass appropriate orders.

5.Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, I am inclined to issue direction to the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.11.2017, on merits and in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

6.The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar pri To The Director of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services DMS Compound Anna Salai Chennai - 600 006.

+1 cc to the Government Pleader sr92532 W.P.No.19647 of 2019 And W.M.P.Nos.19174 and 19175 of 2019 aa29/11/2019 2/4 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/