Madras High CourtWP/34345/2014dismissed as infructuous

E.Sagadevan, v. Government Of Tamil Nadu,

2023-06-06Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.06.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and M.P.No.1 of 2014

1. E.Sagadevan

2. Ammu

3. Venkatesan

4. Kathavaraya Gounder

5. Kumar

6. Malliga

7. Veerappan

8. Murugan

9. Subaramani

10. Subashini

11. Ramu

12. Govindammal

13. Kuppusamy

14. Bavunammal 1/6

15. Govindan

16. Kamalakanni

17. Kasthoori

18. Manomani

19. Kasiammal

20. Pasumalai

21. Kamalakannan

22. Gopinathan

23. Veruthammal

24. Chandra

25. Munusamy

26. Arumugam

27. Durai

28. E.Rajaram

29. C.Rajendran

30. Munusamy

31. Aalmeluammal

32. Durairaj

33. Kanniappan

34. Renugambal ... Petitioners 2/6

Vs.

1. Government of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-9.

2. The Commissioner for Land Administration, Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Chepauk, Chennai-5.

3. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, / Sub Collector, Gingee Revenue Division , Gingee, Villupuram District.

5. The Tahsildar, Gingee Taluk, Gingee, Villupuram District.

6. The Executive Officer, Gingee Town Panchayat, Gingee, Villupuram District.

7. The Block Development Officer / Commissioner, Gingee Panchayat Union, Gingee, Villupuram District.

...Respondents

Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the orders made in Na.Ka.No.A2/18/2014 dated 07.10.2014, 17.10.2014 and 28.10.2014 issued by the 6th respondent 3/6

respectively and quash the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent to issue Patta to the petitioners or any alternative land in terms of various Government Order passed by the Government of Tamil Nadu. For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ilansezhiyan For Respondents :

(for R1 to R6) : Mr.T.Arun Kumar, AGP (for R7) : Mr.R.RAvichandran

O R D E R

The learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners made a submission that the cause arose for the purpose of filing the present writ petition has become vanished. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the submission and the endorsement made, the Writ Petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. (sha) 06.06.2023 Index : Yes Speaking Order 4/6