← Library
Madras High CourtWP/18246/2018dismissed for nonprosecution

D.Maria Goretty,Flat No.F/2 I, v. The Principal Secretary

2021-12-21Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.12.2021 C O R A M THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.18246 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.21556 & 21557 of 2018 D.Maria Goretty

...Petitioner

Vs 1.The Principal Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Deputy Secretary (Revenue), Office of the Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

... Respondents Prayer Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, prayed for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order impugned of respondent No.2, in his letter No. GR 7/1961/2018 dated 25.01.2018 and quash the condition fixating the rent as Rs.6,669/- per month alone as the same is contrary to law.

For Petitioner :

No Appearance For R1 :

Mr.M.Shahjahan Special Government Pleader For R2 :

Mr.R.Bharath Kumar Standing Counsel

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order impugned of respondent No.2, in his letter No. GR 7/1961/2018 dated 25.01.2018 and quash the condition fixating the rent as Rs.6,669/- per month alone as the same is contrary to law. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. The challenge in the Writ Petition is against the impugned order dated 25.01.2018, passed by the second respondent, whereby, increasing the rent of the petitioner's flat.

3.The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that, the similar impugned orders were challenged by many tenants. However, the same was dismissed by this Court. Against which, the Writ Appeals were preferred in W.A.No.535 of 2019 etc batch, which was also dismissed confirming the order passed in the Writ Petition. Therefore, he submitted that the issue in the present Writ Petition is no more res integra. Hence, prayed to dismiss the Writ Petition. 4.Though the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that the issue in the present Writ Petition is no more res integra, since there is no representation for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rst To:

1.The Principal Secretary, Housing & Urban Development Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2.The Deputy Secretary (Revenue), Office of the Managing Director Tamil Nadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

+1cc to Mr.R.Bharath Kumar, Advocate SR.No.69129 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.69550 W.P.No.18246 of 2018 and W.M.P.Nos.21556 & 21557 of 2018 SSV(CO) GMY(19/01/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/