B.Ganesan v. The Secretary

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.11.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P. No.20928 of 2019 B.Ganesan ... Petitioner

Versus

The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Park Town Road, V.O.C Nagar, Chennai - 600 003.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the representation dated 15.06.2019 sent by the petitioner.

For Petitioner : Mr.U.Karunakaran For Respondent : Mr.M.Loganathan

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is subsequent development made in the writ petition. Therefore, the above writ petition has become infructuous. In view of the same, he had also made an endorsement to that effect. 2.Regarding the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar 1/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

klt To The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Park Town Road, V.O.C Nagar, Chennai - 600 003.

+1cc to Mr.U.Karunakaran, Advocate sr.97703 W.P.No.20928 of 2019 spd(co) nr 08/01/2020 2/2 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/