M.Ramkumar v. The Estate Of Late Mrs.Padmini

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 12.02.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN CRP.(NPD).No.723 of 2014 M.Ramkumar ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The Estate of Late Mrs. Padmini Chandrasekaran, rep.by its Executor Dr.H.B.N.Shetty, I.A.S(Retd), S/o Mahabala Shetty, No.17, First Cross, Indra Nagar, Madras - 20.

2.N.Selvarajou Chetty Trust, rep.by its Chariman, Dr.H.B.N.Shetty, I.A.S.(Retd), S/o Mahabala Shetty, No.17, First Cross, Indra Nagar, Madras - 20.

....Respondents 1&2/Plaintiffs 3.Palani Mudaliar (Died) 4.Saravanan 5.Muthukumaran 6.Thirvarasu 7.Kothandaraman 8.Manickammal 9.Kalaimagal 10.Susila 11.Dr.Muthiyan 12.S.Saraswathi 13.M/s.Hindustan Unilever Ltd., Rep.by its Managing Director, Vadamangalam Post, Villianur Commune, Puducherry.

.. Respondents 4 to 13/ Defendants Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order dated 10.02.2014 made in E.P.No.93 of 2011 in O.S.No.1496 of 1994 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif at Puducherry. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For petitioner : Mr.L.G.Sahadevan For Respondents: Mr.A.Muthukumar (for R1 & R2) : Mr.S.Ramasubramaniam (for R13)

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this petition has now become infructuous and to that effect, he has also made an endorsement in the Court bundle.

2.In view of the endorsement and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, there is nothing survives for further adjudication, hence, the revision petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar klt To The II Additional District Munsif at Puducherry. +1 cc to M/s.S.Ramsubramanian, Advocate Sr.No. 11456 CRP.(NPD).No.723 of 2014 SVI(CO) RMP(01/10/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/