Premkumar v. State, Rep By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.05.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL Premkumar, C/o. Subramanian ... Petitioner/Accused Vs.

State, rep. by, The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Tiruppur District.

... Respondent/Complainant (Crime No.284 of 2026) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.284 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr. R. Sasikumar For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

1/8

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner on 18.05.2026 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 praying to grant an order of pre-arrest bail.

2. The petitioner / Accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(1), 118(1), 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with 4 of Women Harassment Act in Crime No.284 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the wife of the petitioner. On 15.05.2026, due to wordy quarrel the petitioner abused and assaulted the defacto complainant. Hence, the case.

4. Mr. R. Sasikumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. However, he submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions to be imposed by this Court. Hence he prayed to grant an order of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. 2/8

5. Per contra, Mr. A. Gopinath, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing on behalf of the respondent - Police submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the defacto complainant and he had relationship out of marriage and the same was questioned by the defacto complainant there was a quarrel, due to which, the petitioner abused and assaulted the defacto complainant with iron pipe. He further submitted that there is one previous case pending against the petitioner.

6. Heard on both sides. This Court has perused the records.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the offences; and that the petitioner has permanent residence and deep roots in society; there is less possibility of absconding; and with a view to give one more opportunity to reform himself, this Court is inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, pre-arrest bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

(i) The petitioner shall be released on pre-arrest bail in the event of his arrest or in the event of his surrender before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet, within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order 3/8

copy is made ready, on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) along with two sureties each for a like sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet.

(ii) The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the Application for Suretyship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet, shall obtain a copy of any one of their identity proofs to ensure their identity.

(iii) The petitioner shall appear and sign before the respondent Police, daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. (iv) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.

(v) The petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

4/8

(vi) The petitioner shall not enter into the victim's house or his place. (vii) The petitioner shall also not, directly or indirectly, cause any threat to the defacto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper the evidence. (viii) The petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court.

(ix) The petitioner shall furnish his residential address and mobile number to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet. (x) On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet or Trial Court, as the case may be, is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions are imposed by him as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K. Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) 13 SCC 283].

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed subject to the conditions stated supra.

5/8

21.05.2026 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ssi/ksa2 Note:-

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the official website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in official website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To

1. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Udumalpet.

2. The Inspector of Police, Udumalpet Police Station, Tiruppur District.

6/8

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

ssi 7/8

Crl.OP.No.13256 of 2026 21.05.2026 8/8