Ramadoss v. The Inspector Of Police

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.

J.

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 379 IPC r/w Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.144 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is falsely implicated in Crime No.144 of 2023, registered under Sections 379 IPC r/w Section 21 (1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and prays for anticipatory bail for the petitioner.

3. In response, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that petitioner had illegally transported 1 1⁄2 units of red soil in a Tipper Lorry bearing No.TN 59 P 8510 without any valid permission. He further submitted that petitioner has no previous case pending against him. Thus, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.Considered the rival submissions and perused the records. 5.Considering the fact that the Tipper lorry and red soil had been recovered and that the petitioner has no previous case pending against him, this Court is of the view that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. Petitioner is directed to make a nonrefundable deposit of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) by way of Demand Draft/RTGS/NEFT to the credit of the concerned District Mineral Foundation Trust, without prejudice to his rights and contentions before the trial Court, on such deposit and production of proof, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.

I, Vellore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 17.07.2023 sli

G.CHANDRASEKHARAN.

J.

sli 17.07.2023