Madras High CourtWP/34736/2014disposed of

M.Mohan @ Mohanram v. Corporation Of Chennai

2021-02-08Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.02.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.34736 of 2014 M.Mohan @Mohanram ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Corporation of Chennai, Rep.by its Commissioner Rippon Buildings, Chennai - 600 003.

2. The Zonal Officer, Old Zone - VI, Corporation of Chennai, Andrasan Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 600 023.

3. The Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration, Water Supply Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, call for the records and quash the impugned order Ma.Aa.6.Na.Ka No.A4/5122/2014 dated 3.12.2014 issued by the second respondent and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate Ground basis.

For Petitioner : M/s.N.Beulah John Selvaraj For R1 & R2 : Mr.R.Gopinath, Standing Counsel For R3 : Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi

ORDER

The prayer made in this Writ Petition is to quash the order dated 03.12.2014 passed by the second respondent and to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.Upon notice, the second and third respondents filed a detailed counter affidavit, inter alia stating that on 06.05.2011 the petitioner's mother submitted an application requesting to provide a job on compassionate ground; at that time, the petitioner was minor and hence, he cannot be provided job under compassionate grounds as per G.O.No.112 of Personnel & Administrative reforms Department dated 23.08.2005. It is further stated therein that after attaining majority, the petitioner submitted another application on 07.05.2013, however, he cannot be provided job as per G.O.No.120 of Labour & Employment Department dated 26.06.1995. Thus, the order impugned herein is correct and the same warrants no interference at the hands of this Court.

3.However, today, when this matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.

4.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar av To

1. The Commissioner Rippon Buildings, Corporation of Chennai, Chennai - 600 003.

2. The Zonal Officer, Old Zone - VI, Corporation of Chennai, Andrasan Road, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 600 023.

3. The Secretary Government, Municipal Administration, Water Supply Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

CA(CO) SM/24/02/2021 W.P.No.34736 of 2014 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/