V.Raju v. The Authorised Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.12.2015

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI and THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE P. DEVADASS W.P. No.23008 of 2013 and M.P. No.1 of 2013 V. Raju Petitioner vs.

The Authorised Officer State Bank of India SAR Branch, Red Cross Building II Floor, 32, Montieth Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008 The Registrar Debt Recovery Tribunal-I Chennai Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records made in the impugned order dated 14.08.2013 made in S.A. No.98 of 2013 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal No.I, Chennai and quash the same insofar as the condition directing the petitioner to deposit 50% amount claimed in the impugned sale notice on or before 20.08.2013.

For petitioner Ms. R. Suvithra for Mr. V. Chandrasekaran For R1 Notice served - No appearance

ORDER

(delivered by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. The learned counsel has also made an endorsement to that effect as under: "Since the writ petition becomes infructuous, so the petition may be withdrawn."

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

In view of the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Costs made easy. Connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar To 1)The Authorised Officer State Bank of India SAR Branch, Red Cross Building II Floor, 32, Montieth Road Egmore, Chennai 600 008 2)The Registrar, Debt. Recovery Tribunal-I, Chennai.

W.P. No.23008 of 2013 pa[co] srg 28/12/2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/