Ameesha Kasushai v. The Central Administrative Tribunal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.11.2024 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN Ameesha Kaushal ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep. By its Registrar, Chennai Bench, City Civil Court Complex, High Court Buildings, Chenna - 600 104.
2.The Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001.
3.The Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi - 110069.
4.The Director, National Industrial Security Academy, CISF NISA Campus, Nisa Hakimpet, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 078.
5.The Deputy Inspector General of police (Recruitment), Central Reserve Police Force, East Block No.7, Level - 04, Section - 01, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110 066.
... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the impugned order dated 12.11.2020 passed in OA/310/490/2020 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Bench, the 1st respondent herein and quash the same insofar as it does not grant the interim prayer sought. For Petitioner : Mr.Srujith Krishna for Mr.Naveen Kumar Murthi For Respondents : Tribunal (for R1) Dr.G.Babu (for R2) Central Government Standing Counsel Mr.Su.Srinivasan (for R3 to 5) Central Government Standing Counsel
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The present Writ Petition has been instituted challenging the interim order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai Branch on 12.11.2020 in O.A.No.490 of 2020.
2.
The Tribunal passed the interim order that the interviews and all selection process shall go on subject to the out come of the original application filed in O.A.No.490 of 2020. The matter was directed to be posted for final hearing for completion of pleadings on 21.01.2021. Almost 3.5 years lapsed. This Court has not granted any interim order in the present Writ Petition. 3.
More so, the order impugned is to proceed with the selection process. However, subject to the outcome of the original application. Therefore, the rights of the petitioner is preserved and if at all he is aggrieved, he is at liberty to raise his contentions before the Tribunal in the Original Application, which is pending.
4.
With these observations, the Writ Petition is dismissed. [S.M.S., J.] [M.J.R., J.] 11.11.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order gd
To 1.The Central Administrative Tribunal, Rep. By its Registrar, Chennai Bench, City Civil Court Complex, High Court Buildings, Chenna - 600 104.
2.The Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, North Block, New Delhi - 110 001.
3.The Union Public Service Commission, Dholpur House, Shahjahan Road, New Delhi - 110069.
4.The Director, National Industrial Security Academy, CISF NISA Campus, Nisa Hakimpet, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 078.
5.The Deputy Inspector General of police (Recruitment), Central Reserve Police Force, East Block No.7, Level - 04, Section - 01, R.K.Puram, New Delhi - 110 066.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
gd 11.11.2024