← Library
Madras High CourtWP/14984/2014dismissed

M/S.Karunya Educational Trust v. The Inspector General Of

2019-03-28Honourable Mr Justice D. Krishnakumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.03.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.14984 of 2014 Karunya Educational Trust Rep. by its Trustee C.Sundararaj ...

Petitioner Vs.

1 The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

2 The Sub Registrar, Thodamuthur, Coimbatore.

...

Respondents Prayer:- The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to register and release their sale deed, dated 22.12.2000 registered and assigned pending Ref.No.P155/2000 on the file of the respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.Krishnaprasad for M/S Sarvabhauman Associates For Respondents: Mr.P.Purushothaman, G.A.

O R D E R

According to the petitioner, the petitioner has presented a sale deed, dated 22.12.2000 before the second respondent for registration. The second respondent insisted the petitioner to furnish patta and chitta copies to release the original sale deed. Despite request made by the petitioner to accept the documents to show title of the vendors to the property and release the sale deed, the second respondent is retaining the original sale deed, dated 22.12.2000. Therefore, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court for the aforesaid prayer.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2 The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner by letter, dated 12.3.2019 has stated that civil suit in O.S.No.463 of 2013 is pending on the file of the IV Additional District Munsif, Coimbatore and the petitioner requested the second respondent not to register the documents till disposal of the aforesaid suit and the present writ petition. Therefore, the respondent has not registered the documents.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the said letter issued by the petitioner Trust was misunderstood and the same was issued to prevent registration of documents in respect of the subject matter of the property by third party.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, the writ petition is dismissed. It is for the petitioner to work out remedy before the authority concerned. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vaan To 1 The Inspector General of Registration, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 028.

2 The Sub Registrar, Thodamuthur, Coimbatore.

+1cc to M/S.Sarvabhauman Associates, Advocate Sr.30189 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.31016 W.P.No.14984 of 2014 ppa[co] srg 6/6/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/